Pre- Trial Diversion and Alternative Sanctions Briefing. Introduction. Pre- Trial Diversion and Alternative Sanctions. Incarceration has long been the traditional response to persons convicted of crimes. These methods are called alternative sanctions. Pre- trial Diversion Programs. Alternatives for Non-Violent Offenders. ALTERNATIVE TO INCARCERATION (ATI) PROGRAMS. Diversionary and Alternative Sanctions Scope. Using Risk Assessment to Inform Sentencing Decisions for Nonviolent Offenders. Alternative Sentencing in the Federal. Alternative Sentencing in the Federal Criminal. They diverted nonviolent offenders in selected pilot project areas from. To be eligible for a pre- trial diversion program a defendant must be charged for the first time with one of the following statutorily targeted offenses: . AICs monitor defendant and offender behavior and provide structured, center- based, day and evening services such as: . Residential treatment services include halfway houses, transitional housing, detoxification, intensive drug treatment (up to 1. EVOLVE is a 2. 6 or 5. Department of Justice to determine the best practices for sanctioning domestic violence offenders and effecting long- term behavior change. Clients can participate in any additional alternative sanction programs such as an AIC or outpatient substance abuse treatment concurrent with the two domestic violence programs. Special Population. Female defendants and offenders often have dependent children, a history of substance abuse, or have been victims of abuse, sexual assault, or violent or domestic violence crimes. The Latino Youth Offender Program provides intensive case management and counseling for Latino/Latina defendants and offenders between 1. Defendants enter a conditional guilty plea to the criminal charge and are sentenced according to the guidelines set forth in Table I- 3. A defendant admitted for a violation of probation who successfully completes the program has his or her sentence terminated. Pre-Trial Diversion and Alternative. Juvenile Alternative Services Sanctions (JASS). A 1. 98. 2 law (Public Act 8. Mediation services last less than 9. Pre- trial Diversion Programs. Pre- trial diversion programs are not included in the analysis because the division does not set contracted capacity nor uniformly collect reliable client admission and discharge data. Alternative Sanctions and Specialized Courts The total number of residential beds and non- residential client openings (called “slots”) determines capacity. Figure II- 1 shows the trend in contracted capacity compared to capacity to serve for alternative sanction and specialized court programs except for the Drug Intervention Program, which has no capacity data. The remainder of the population - - almost 6. The program utilization rate is the percentage of slots or beds used in a fiscal year. To further explore this trend, committee staff analyzed the alternative sanction programs with the most client admissions: Alternative Incarceration Centers; adult services; and residential treatment services. The number of admissions for adult services is consistently well above the capacity to serve during the period under analysis, although the actual number of admissions did not steadily increase. A Review of Graduated Sanction Programs.Over- capacity to serve is caused, in part, because judges frequently order substance abuse and mental health evaluations of defendants and offenders and further require any treatment recommended as a result of the evaluation to be part of the bail, case disposition, and sentencing processes. Satisfactory discharge rate. CSSD has focused attention on developing gender specific programs to address the unique service and treatment needs of this offender group. The calculated scores of the LSI and ASUS determine an offender supervision level (or classification) and treatment plan. Source of Information: CSSD Supervision Services Policy No. A probation officer is also required to make collateral contacts with persons involved in providing treatment or services to the offender and persons such as a spouse, family, friends, and employer who have knowledge about the offender’s activities and compliance with special conditions. Staff Development and Quality Control Division The Staff Development and Quality Control Division is composed of: (1) the Training Academy; (2) the Quality Control Unit; and (3) the Statewide Community Services Unit. As discussed in Section Three, program development and design is done under the auspices of the Operations Division, in particular its “Center for Best Practices.” The center identifies specific program interventions or curricula previously shown to be effective in addressing particular criminogenic needs, whichare offender characteristics (e. The Grants and Contracts Monitoring Unit, within the Administrative Division, is responsible for management of programmatic and fiscal compliance of agencies and persons under contract with CSSD. In addition, agencies under comprehensive monitoring undergo an annual program audit in accordance with the division’s financial guidelines. The administrative monitoring process consists of as- needed visits and an annual monitoring report that includes overall contractor performance, financial status, program accomplishments, program contract compliance, CSSD satisfaction, and any recommendations proposed by the monitoring team. During 2. 00. 4, there were 9. CSSD contracts requiring comprehensive monitoring and 5. Consistent with the new legislative mandate, the division had previously adopted evidenced- based programming, a strategy that relies on collecting and monitoring outcome measures. A focus on recidivism will help to manage the growing prison population, but is intended to eventually have a broader impact by addressing the causes of crime rather than simply focusing a prison bed savings. A sentencing commission established by the legislature had just recommended the state change from an indeterminate sentencing system to a determinant one, which would ultimately exacerbate overcrowding. Office of Alternative Sanctions. The Office is an outgrowth of a multi- year trend in Connecticut to develop a range of court- based sanctions in addition to traditional incarceration and probation sanctions. However, virtually all the substantive statutory responsibilities related to alternative sanctions, first codified in 1. In 1. 99. 9, the legislature established by statute a Court Support Services Division (CSSD) within the Judicial Branch. This new division was to consist of the transferred duties of the Office of Adult Probation, the Office of Alternative Sanctions, the Office of Bail Commission, the Family Division, and the Juvenile Detention Services Division. Prisoner re- entry strategy. The new offender re- entry strategy heavily relies on the existing alternative sanction network to implement many of the initiatives to reduce recidivism. Christiano (Torrington). Scores are calculated for the following areas. Motivational Interviewing. It is purported to lead to less client defensiveness, noncompliance, and program dropouts. Motivational interviewing strategies. CSSD has contracted for a four- year evaluation of its alternative sanction programs and the new Probation Risk Reduction Program. Performance information is collected by JSAT from individual alternative sanction program providers, probation officers, and the criminal courts. The offender outcome data includes: (1) termination and discharge status; (2) official recidivism (re- arrest) records; (3) self- report deviant behavior; and (4) self- report grade and employment retention. For a detailed description of the bail setting and release process refer to the Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee final report on Bail Services in Connecticut, December 2. Infoline 2- 1- 1 originated in 1. Connecticut and the United Way. State law requires a pre- sentence investigation (PSI) report for offenders convicted for the first time of an offense, except a capital felony, that may result in a prison term of more than one year. Jackson, Senate Proceedings, June 6, 1. Public Act 0. 4- 2. Refer to Factors Impacting Prison Overcrowding, Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee (December 2. For a detailed definition and analysis of recidivism, refer to the Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee report on Recidivism in Connecticut, 2. High risk offenders are those who have a greater likelihood of committing significantly more crimes (i.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2017
Categories |